conbersa.ai
Comparisons5 min read

Social Media Scheduling Tools Compared: Buffer vs Hootsuite vs Later

Neil Ruaro·Founder, Conbersa
·
scheduling-toolsbufferhootsuitesocial-media-management

Social media scheduling tools are software platforms that let you create, schedule, and publish social media content across multiple platforms from a single dashboard. The four most widely used tools - Buffer, Hootsuite, Later, and Sprout Social - each serve different segments of the market. According to G2's social media management category, there are over 300 tools in this space, but these four consistently rank as the most adopted solutions, collectively serving millions of businesses worldwide.

How Do the Top Scheduling Tools Compare?

Buffer

Best for: Solopreneurs, small startups, and teams that want simplicity.

Buffer built its reputation on being the simplest scheduling tool available. The interface is clean and focused - you write a post, pick your channels, choose a time, and schedule. No feature bloat, no complex dashboards.

Pricing: Free for up to 3 channels. Essentials plan starts at $6/month per channel. Team plan at $12/month per channel adds collaboration features and unlimited team members.

Strengths: Easiest tool to learn and use, affordable pricing that scales linearly, clean analytics, and a solid mobile app. Buffer's AI Assistant helps generate post ideas and variations.

Limitations: Analytics are basic compared to Hootsuite and Sprout Social. No social listening or inbox management on lower tiers. Limited agency features - no client workspaces or white-label reporting.

Hootsuite

Best for: Mid-size teams and agencies managing multiple accounts with a need for comprehensive analytics.

Hootsuite is the oldest major scheduling tool, and its feature set reflects years of expansion. It offers scheduling, analytics, social listening, inbox management, ad management, and team collaboration in a single platform.

Pricing: Professional plan at $99/month for 1 user and 10 social accounts. Team plan at $249/month for 3 users. Enterprise pricing is custom.

Strengths: Comprehensive feature set, strong analytics and reporting, social listening capabilities, robust team permissions, and broad platform support including YouTube.

Limitations: Expensive compared to alternatives, especially for small teams. The interface has become complex as features have been added over the years. Customer support quality has been inconsistent based on Trustpilot reviews. Recent pricing increases have pushed some users to competitors.

Later

Best for: Visual-first brands, Instagram-focused teams, and creators.

Later started as an Instagram scheduling tool and has expanded to other platforms while maintaining its visual-first approach. The drag-and-drop visual planner lets you see exactly how your Instagram grid will look before posting.

Pricing: Starter at $25/month for 1 social set (1 profile per network). Growth at $45/month for 3 social sets. Advanced at $80/month for 6 social sets.

Strengths: Best visual content planner in the category, excellent Instagram features (grid planning, link in bio tool), strong user-generated content discovery, and Linkin.bio feature for driving traffic from Instagram.

Limitations: Historically Instagram-focused, so features for X, LinkedIn, and TikTok are less mature. Analytics are decent but not as comprehensive as Hootsuite or Sprout Social. Not ideal for text-heavy platforms.

Sprout Social

Best for: Larger teams, agencies, and enterprises that need advanced analytics and CRM features.

Sprout Social is the premium option in this category, offering the deepest analytics, social CRM functionality, and enterprise-grade features. It is the tool most large agencies and enterprise marketing teams adopt.

Pricing: Standard at $249/month per seat. Professional at $399/month per seat. Advanced at $499/month per seat.

Strengths: Best-in-class analytics and reporting, social CRM that tracks customer interactions across platforms, excellent team workflow and approval features, strong social listening, and comprehensive competitive analysis. Forrester's social media management report named Sprout Social a leader.

Limitations: Significantly more expensive than alternatives - a team of 3 costs at least $747/month. The per-seat pricing makes it prohibitive for small startups. Overpowered for teams that just need basic scheduling.

Which Tool Should You Choose?

The decision depends on your team size, budget, and primary use case:

Factor Buffer Hootsuite Later Sprout Social
Monthly cost (1 user) $6-12/channel $99+ $25+ $249+
Best platform support All major All major + YouTube Instagram + visual All major
Analytics depth Basic Advanced Moderate Best-in-class
Ease of use Easiest Moderate Easy Moderate
Agency features Minimal Strong Moderate Strongest
Social listening No Yes No Yes

Choose Buffer if you are a solo founder or small team that needs affordable, simple scheduling without complexity.

Choose Hootsuite if you need analytics, social listening, and team collaboration at a mid-range price point and can handle the learning curve.

Choose Later if your strategy is visual-first and Instagram-centric, and you value grid planning and UGC discovery.

Choose Sprout Social if you have the budget and need enterprise-grade analytics, social CRM, and agency workflow features.

What Are the Limitations of Scheduling Tools in General?

All scheduling tools share common constraints worth understanding:

Platform API restrictions. Scheduling tools rely on each platform's API, which limits what they can do. Some post types (carousel posts on certain platforms, collaborative posts, certain interactive features) cannot be scheduled through third-party tools.

No account health management. Scheduling tools handle content timing but not account infrastructure. They do not manage account health scores, detect shadowban risk, or handle rate limiting across multiple accounts. For teams managing many accounts, the scheduling layer is necessary but insufficient.

Engagement still requires human attention. Scheduling automates publishing but not community management. Comments, DMs, and mentions still need human response, and the best social media results come from active engagement beyond just scheduled posts.

For startups that outgrow what scheduling tools offer, the next step is typically a combination of a scheduling tool for content timing plus dedicated infrastructure for account management, engagement automation, and cross-platform distribution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles